From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6d571e7ab9b5287ae9ef76daae281013eb3c51f333664e767238c5f3c54baa93
Message ID: <324DC2AB.3CE8@gte.net>
Reply To: <960928093843_295524911@emout08.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-29 02:51:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 10:51:45 +0800
From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 10:51:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Crypto and six yr old sex perverts: Project Electric Potatoes [CRYPTO]
In-Reply-To: <960928093843_295524911@emout08.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <324DC2AB.3CE8@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Scottauge@aol.com wrote:
> Using crypto may be required to keep ya outta jail, given the
> guberment has gone so far low as to "route out this six year old sex
> pervert busy kissing the girls." (Quoted for emphasis.)
> I wonder when sexual harassment will become a sex offence. Are the
> red sashed sex cores of Orwell's 1984 around the corner?
[remaining text and technical-related discussion deleted]
This post is a perfect example of why you'd need a comprehensive
definition of how to use the "[CRYPTO]" string in subject headers.
Could I suggest:
1. [CRYPTO] at the extreme left for actual technical discussion (with
examples and math, probably).
2. [CRYPTO] elsewhere in the subject line, to indicate crypto
technically-related discussion without examples and math, as in the
end of the Project Electric Potatoes posting.
3. [CRYPTO] nowhere in the subject line for all else.
Return to September 1996
Return to “Scottauge@aol.com”