1996-09-28 - [CRYPTO], or hash, anyway

Header Data

From: “P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 741c28fff0ac8381bdd76f302fb7b14bc7a9c42a2686b5982d5c7ba1b150b189
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960928150731.6406A-100000@fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-28 21:29:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 05:29:58 +0800

Raw message

From: "P. J. Ponder" <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 05:29:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [CRYPTO], or hash, anyway
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960928150731.6406A-100000@fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I need a copy of the appendix to the SHA FIPS pub (180-1?) that has the 
three test texts and corresponding SHA hashes, so that I can test an SHA 
implementation I'm working with.  I have tried the NIST site, and can't 
seem to get through.  If anybody has this test deal, or knows where it is 
out there on the net somewhere, please let me know.  Thanks in advance.

(My problem is I keep getting different hashes between an MS-DOS version
I'm running and one running on a Linux box, when I ftp the same files back
and forth. @#$%.  I thought maybe I was having problems with some kind of
Line-feed vs. Carriage Return/Line-feed conversion deal, but it also
generates different hashes on binary files.  So I thought I would test the
Linux and the DOS one against the specs in the FIPS, and see which one is
hosed up.)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     to unsubscribe, send to majordomo@toad.com a message that reads:
                        unsubscribe cypherpunks
              in the message body, not the SUBJECT: line.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+






Thread