From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7478c65118f52ce637abad534f06667bce4da4cb201f5c80f6ad11e52d56aa9a
Message ID: <mDX3uD2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199609301523.LAA15152@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-30 23:56:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 07:56:41 +0800
From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 07:56:41 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: the theory of split currency
In-Reply-To: <199609301523.LAA15152@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <mDX3uD2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
>
> > Is there a name for a dual or split currency, in which
> > there is one currency for domestic use and another, different
> > appearing, currency for foreign usage?
>
> I don't know of such a name, however...
>
> > Does anyone know of any country which has had such a
> > split currency?
>
> ...this has been a common situation, in fact. South Africa, China, the
> Soviet Union, and other unpleasant places have repeatedly done
> this. Its usually a remarkably stupid idea.
>
> Perry
Several Western European countries had such split currencies after WW II.
Belgium's two francs have almost been phased out. Spain is the only major
country with two currencies (ESP and ESB). They actually fetch slightly
different interest rates.
Chile introduced 'unidad de fomento' a while back, and many other minor
players do something similar.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
Return to October 1996
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”