From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7e45b6ac3e8b5a3abf47772bdbb756edef74912b6f1bf007b87d09923fd94757
Message ID: <199609191739.NAA21396@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199609190441.AAA12078@dhp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-19 23:29:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 07:29:52 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 07:29:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Cypherpunks is dead anyway... (was Cypherpunk Enquirer)
In-Reply-To: <199609190441.AAA12078@dhp.com>
Message-ID: <199609191739.NAA21396@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The Enquirer wrote...
> Scientists flocked to toad.com recently in response to the first
> authenticated sighting of a Perrygram in months. The Perrygram,
> only recently thought extinct, was spotted on the cypherpunks
> mailing list after an absence of several months. Specialists
> speculate that it may have detected the recent list increase in its
> favorite food - pure, unadulterated bullshit.
In fact, Perrygrams are dead because I've given up on this list.
There is no more cryptography discussion going on -- the list is
basically a very low grade political rant forum, with most of the
rants having no relevance to crypto.
(I suppose "I told you so" doesn't help much.)
Anyway, as soon as I find a home for Cypherpunks Mark II I'm starting
it and unsubscribing from here. Cypherpunks is dead. This happens to
all mailing lists eventually. I suppose it had to happen here.
(Finding a new list home has been a low priority project for me
recently because I've been busy with "real work" -- however, if you
run (I emphasize *run*) a well connected site and can handle a list
with 1500 subscribers or so, and don't mind a somewhat more
restrictive charter than "post anything you like at any time", please
get in touch.)
Perry
Return to September 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”