1996-09-12 - Re: 16oz packages

Header Data

From: JonWienk@ix.netcom.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7e9d2cb813a9895a57acedd8803530a6b880db2cdbf714739e576ca2555f4c72
Message ID: <199609120618.XAA19460@dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960907060416.22456B-100000@escape.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-12 08:20:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:20:01 +0800

Raw message

From: JonWienk@ix.netcom.com
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:20:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: 16oz packages
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960907060416.22456B-100000@escape.com>
Message-ID: <199609120618.XAA19460@dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


The Unabomber used his intended victim's address for the return address on 
several if his mail bombs, and then used insufficient postage on them to ensure 
that they would be "returned to sender." It would seem that the same tactic 
could be used now, if packages over 16oz are "sent back."  How are we any safer 
now?

Thread

• Return to September 1996

• Return to ““<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>”
• Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”
• Return to “JonWienk@ix.netcom.com”
• Return to “nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)”

• Return to ““Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>”

• 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:25:15 +0800) - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly? - “Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>
  • 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 23:27:01 +0800) - 16oz packages - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
    • 1996-09-06 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 03:01:59 +0800) - Re: 16oz packages - nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)
    • 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 20:19:04 +0800) - Re: 16oz packages - ”<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>
      • 1996-09-12 (Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:20:01 +0800) - Re: 16oz packages - JonWienk@ix.netcom.com