From: Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@veriweb.com>
To: “Douglas B. Renner” <dougr@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
Message Hash: 806600321b3f08553b734f2483f6881705b23ad3c5e17874544e2e9408383245
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.93.960920135806.13801E-100000@descartes.veriweb.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9609201518.A433-0100000@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-21 00:18:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 08:18:57 +0800
From: Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@veriweb.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 08:18:57 +0800
To: "Douglas B. Renner" <dougr@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
Subject: Re: Paradox: NO OPPRESSION IN AMERICA
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9609201518.A433-0100000@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.93.960920135806.13801E-100000@descartes.veriweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Well I'm just grumpy enough right now to tear this apart... :)
On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Douglas B. Renner wrote:
> Those of you who took Logic 1001 will recall the paradox known as
> "The Heap" which goes like this:
>
> 1. A single grain of sand does not constitute a heap of sand.
An debatable but valid assumption.
> 2. You can create a heap from a non-heap by adding a single grain of sand.
How is a non-heap defined? 1 grain? 0 grains? If (2) is to be true, it
can't be 0, since you assumed (1), so a non-heap must be 1 grain.
> 3. Therefore, there is *NO SUCH THING* as a heap of sand.
Huh? How do you draw that conclusion? (1) and (2) are not contradictory in
any way. You said 1 grain is not a heap, but >1 is. Fine. Valid way of
defining a heap/non-heap of sand. Nothing to do with (3).
>
> You with me here? Okay, this is important, because the public actually does
> think like this:
Very debatable. Very general.
>
> 1. Our current society in America is not oppressive. (generally accepted)
Very debatable.
>
> 2. You cannot change a non-oppressive society into an oppressive society
> by removing one liberty from its citizens. (also generally accepted)
Rubbish. If the government removes all liberties at once, that's
oppressive, but if they do it one at a time, it's not?
>
> 3. Therefore, it is not possible for America to become an oppressive society.
>
More Rubbish. Not only are your assumptions flawed, but the heap
argument and the oppression argument are entirely unrelated.
Nothing personal, mind you. :)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Jeremey Barrett
Senior Software Engineer jeremey@veriweb.com
VeriWeb Internet Corp. http://www.veriweb.com/
PGP Key fingerprint = 3B 42 1E D4 4B 17 0D 80 DC 59 6F 59 04 C3 83 64
PGP Public Key: http://www.veriweb.com/people/jeremey/pgpkey.html
"less is more." -- Mies van de Rohe.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMkMLVC/fy+vkqMxNAQFHsgQAmK/nDEVv17ntZ2k172/S5ps4nYJeCFjM
4Ek8eOTG54pju5CYAZBTAYIOZNX4iDp4vK3Qyj3d1PAqpLCqQPJo3/Zr/dz21RH8
RkIP4IvEyFGNzpedh1yFe8wj8zGOPXk9OdblNujx8fFmThuk02zUJyUG+GDxBdDa
zQGuNpTT7H8=
=MFgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1996
Return to “Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@veriweb.com>”