cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-09-26 - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

Header Data

From: Derek Bell <dbell@maths.tcd.ie>
To: CP <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 86f0e8909881d170339baabd02fb65fe7ce4197a00713b18367e18935300c354
Message ID: <9609251925.aa18524@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Reply To: <3.0b24.32.19960924064658.006b3540@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-26 02:18:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:18:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Bell <dbell@maths.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:18:34 +0800
To: CP <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
In-Reply-To: <3.0b24.32.19960924064658.006b3540@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <9609251925.aa18524@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <3.0b24.32.19960924064658.006b3540@mail.teleport.com>, Rich Burrough
s writes:
>At 08:33 PM 9/23/96 -0700, tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote in response to PH-B:
>>I for one don't respond well to extortion threats, so write your damned
>>article.

	I agree; PH-B is commiting a bunch of fallacies here and tarring
all cypherpunks with the same brush as Jim Bell just because they haven't
repudiated Assasination Politics is just being obnoxious.

>I personally don't have the time or energy to contribute to the AP threads.
>That != approval for the idea.

	Ditto; I could spend time analysing AP, but life's too short to waste
it on refuting everything I disagree with in detail.

	Derek "who is _not_ Jim" Bell

Thread