From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
To: whgiii@amaranth.com (William H. Geiger III)
Message Hash: 8f2c96d404eb8a46a46b1dcd33b247aa22513f54370034504f76bc0c551b8bc3
Message ID: <199609052242.PAA24752@eff.org>
Reply To: <199609050409.XAA28542@mailhub.amaranth.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-06 11:39:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:39:30 +0800
From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:39:30 +0800
To: whgiii@amaranth.com (William H. Geiger III)
Subject: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
In-Reply-To: <199609050409.XAA28542@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Message-ID: <199609052242.PAA24752@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> >If this is the case she needs to be _much_ more careful about what she
> >says in `personal' interviews.
>
> <sigh>
>
> There seems to be a point being missed in this thread. :(
>
> This was not a 'personal' interview. The paper was not interested in
> Ms. Dyson's views on anonymity on the internet because she seemed like a
> nice person. The only reason she was interviewed is because of her
> position with the EFF as chairwoman.
Rather unlikely, actually. Dyson is far better known, everywhere but the
Internet early-adopter crowd, as publisher of Release 1.0 and an industry
analyst. Same goes for a lot of our other boardmembers. Who many people
outside of the civ-lib crowd know Jane Metcalfe from EFF, vs. from Wired?
Even Mitch Kapor is better know as founder of Lotus than of EFF. A lot of
press coverage she gets never even mentions EFF at all! Barlow's
probalby the only exception - retired ranchers and songwriters who aren't
also singers generally don't attract many reporters.
--
<HTML><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/~mech/"> Stanton McCandlish
</A><HR><A HREF="mailto:mech@eff.org"> mech@eff.org
</A><P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/"> Electronic Frontier Foundation
</A><P> Online Activist </HTML>
Return to September 1996
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”