1996-09-21 - Re: DL in exchange for fingerprint

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: burris@apdg.com
Message Hash: 915e1d097b1b257b6514d4f31f6a184286dfa68429e847dbbe52a1b79ecd19d3
Message ID: <324415D5.24E7@gte.net>
Reply To: <ae66bb9816021004790c@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-21 19:19:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 03:19:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 03:19:06 +0800
To: burris@apdg.com
Subject: Re: DL in exchange for fingerprint
In-Reply-To: <ae66bb9816021004790c@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <324415D5.24E7@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Kurt Vile wrote:
> >By the way, the next rev of the California driver's license will
> >reportedly have one's *Social Security Number* printed on the card!
> >So much for the statement clearly printed on my card:
> Illinois already has such a law, in fact you must have an SSN to
> even get a DL.  Fortunately, the law allows a citizen-unit to choose
> if they want their SSN on their DL (imagine that, a choice!) - the
> flip side is that you have to specifically ask them not to print
> them - they won't ask you.
> One would hope that CA's law might provide a similar out...

Oh, yeah.  This "optional" SSN is a great idea, yeah.  So late at night, 
you get pulled over, and the officer notes that YOU (one of less than a 
thousand people who don't have the DL-SSN) don't actually have the 
DL-SSN.  Well, just don't get pulled over....







Thread