From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 09:29:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Newsgroup proposal: misc.anonymous
In-Reply-To: <199609270522.WAA14373@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.960927182737.883A-100000@gak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 26 Sep 1996, John Anonymous MacDonald wrote:

> This sounds like a good idea.  I would certainly vote for such a news
> group.  Should the name be misc.anonymous or misc.anonymous.messages?
> Are alt.anonymous and alt.anonymous.messages basically to different
> newsgroups for exactly the same purpose, or is there some difference
> between them.

This is what's listed in the newsgroups file:

alt.anonymous		alt!  Who goes there?
alt.anonymous.messages	An anonymous message pool newgroup, whatever that is.

Alt.anonymous is just another content-free, basically dead newsgroup.  Alt.
anonymous.messages is the group used for message pools.  Since the general
rule for naming newsgroups is to use dots only for designating a lower group
hierarchy.  misc.anonymous-messages is probably a better name, since there is
no misc.anonymous.* newsgroup hierarchy.

Mark
- -- 
PGP encrypted mail prefered.
Key fingerprint = d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMkxX8yzIPc7jvyFpAQEwRggApePkCcuHKMy3l3dHaMfBBr44WkZwSKJo
VcRnC16rKu8cof/vS1rAZPv6/504Z9u4Q8M+S5nxK8V6vVFPzA+TF/I/TQs8FekU
eTAAmD2FXarZRYUKw4iraxRba5CkHuKNs8h7G+d9XrfZ71kFMlcP9Kmi968bxx+I
IuyVX6PEmaapbC88GZukfDCfTwuW0aZvhqseB/dzSeDnDXgfMYdNXHXBXJr+maiH
Nf6tXNFYlsf1D3D/JF6u31n4JDGi9fHrz+9nNH6xpKy8EAehJzQd2aQME2fKDYHJ
zu+tfyLc8I/irYpTOUtZ0nRYxUxBZoJ8moucD9569erZY0OEMqc4/Q==
=lblb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----