1996-09-19 - Re: GAK, GAP, GAY

Header Data

From: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9900beee03213ef6a437dab7f9381a49033292cd1ffbf148c86e927e88cfcde3
Message ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960919072143.16973D@cor.sos.sll.se>
Reply To: <199609190117.SAA04924@netcom21.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-19 09:02:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:02:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:02:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GAK, GAP, GAY
In-Reply-To: <199609190117.SAA04924@netcom21.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960919072143.16973D@cor.sos.sll.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:

> of blinding and zero-knowledge protocols applied to health databases.
> it seems reasonable that this can be worked out.

De-identified records are common in medical research, where applicable.
The problem is that for effective epidemiological research the
self-generated ID you propose must be applied in a lot of databases
outside of health care. The epidemiologist wants to know when you
were born, when you give birth or die or buy liquor, your income,
standard of living, grade of radon contamination in your house,
what Web-pages you access etc etc. (The Swedish Post is currently
spending a lot of money advertising their new Web services. For
full access to such sensitive data as detailed wheather maps you 
have to enter your name, address and Person Number - for credit
information, they say - and they will send you, by snail mail, a
username and password; http://www.torget.se)

So in the end you haven't really gained much by creating your own
ID - it will be just as useful to the State as if they had
given it to you.


Asgaard
   





Thread