From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 99167b003cfb5aa1a4af8d0beb2acbdfe5cf1fb5a2158de1198d93e87489bcd0
Message ID: <3234624B.1C93@gte.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-10 01:28:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:28:19 +0800
From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:28:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: L.A. Times articles, etc.
Message-ID: <3234624B.1C93@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm sure everyone is familiar with how newspaper articles are not
necessarily "pure" news, i.e., they're often slanted toward a particular
point of view.
Go back a few years, maybe 20 or more, and look at the front page of the
L.A. Times (or probably any big-city paper). Many or most news pieces
written by UPI, AP, etc., now 100% are written internally.
What y'all might want to think about is not just slanting and bias, but
how certain people and organizations can actually *plant* a phony story
on page one of a major paper like the L.A. Times. Go back a few months
and check out the front-page article on real estate prices in the Calif.
"Ventura Keys" area. Totally false. Story alleged that prices were
"skyrocketing"; prices actually were absolutely flat, after having
fallen by 35% or more in the previous couple of years.
Whoever authorized this story, if they didn't get a big kickback or gain
some points for some future operation, then I can't imagine why they
would print such a thing.
I hate to suggest anyone become more cynical than they already are, but,
the front page(s) of a big-city newspaper are some of the most valuable
real estate in western civilization, so do the math....
Return to September 1996
Return to “Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>”
1996-09-10 (Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:28:19 +0800) - L.A. Times articles, etc. - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>