1996-09-27 - Re: Weaknesses in Smart Cards? (Re: FLA_wed)

Header Data

From: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9a47276c377b87e231a2dfa53b97aa39a653e3efe64c6e75c2a630395c6c73ee
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960926181816.1450A-100000@stiletto.acadian.net>
Reply To: <ae6ffc4f0b02100486bd@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 01:57:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:57:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:57:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Weaknesses in Smart Cards? (Re: FLA_wed)
In-Reply-To: <ae6ffc4f0b02100486bd@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960926181816.1450A-100000@stiletto.acadian.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 26 Sep 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

[... much deleted but boiling down to: ]

> Not a good journalistic trend, in my opinion.

Yah, but since 40-bit cyphers is seen by the "media" as something most
people don't use, but "smart cards" are just another type of
fraud-resistant credit card being used by Everyone Already, of course,
they have to start a stampede now.

I wonder if this isn't just plain Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt rearing
its ugly head... does Lucent (they were the ones, right?) have a competing
product?

Phil Fraering          The above is the opinion of neither my internet
pgf@acadian.net        service provider nor my employer.
318/261-9649               






Thread