1996-09-27 - Is “Black Unicorn” a lawyer, or just a nym used by a lawyer?

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a1c3f46a57d793728d5efe4610de0b808702f2858b2a506760ef7a23533b49cf
Message ID: <199609270017.RAA18940@dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 06:24:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:24:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:24:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Is "Black Unicorn" a lawyer, or just a nym used by a lawyer?
Message-ID: <199609270017.RAA18940@dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May said, in a discussion on another topic
        While BU is a lawyer, and I am not, I maintain
        [........]
Is it correct to say that "Black Unicorn is a lawyer",
or only that the nym "Black Unicorn" is used by a person
who's a lawyer under another name?  "Black Unicorn" at least doesn't
appear to be a _practicing lawyer_, though maybe [name used for legal
work by person who also uses nym "Black Unicorn"] is a practicing lawyer.

Tim's signature file no longer asserts that he's a Licensed Ontologist,
but this seems to be the kind of question you'd ask a L.O. if you knew one.  

#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> 	
# You can get PGP software outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto






Thread