From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a5f83c69170a5952ef40d6af7b7468825079b6e8fa87d21cbe6b60c615fdaec6
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960904104848.27739I-100000@eff.org>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960904115249.006b6580@mail.well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-04 21:56:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 05:56:34 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 05:56:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960904115249.006b6580@mail.well.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960904104848.27739I-100000@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Harassment in person when someone is shouting at you in the street,
spittle flying in your face, is one thing.
Online "harassment," I believe, is a problem that can be solved with
technical means. Don't like someone? Killfile them.
-Declan
On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
> At 07:44 AM 9/3/96 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
> >At 03:17 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
> >> Not necessarily. The character of the anonymous speech is decisive. If you
> >> use anonymity to cloak harassment, for instance, the anonymity (which
> >> removes accountability) is a problem. The accountability issue is real and
> >> should be addressed, not evaded.
> >
> >No: The harassment is the problem, not the anonymity that makes it
> >possible.
>
> The harassment is one problem, the lack of accountability another. Which is
> not to say that 'lack of accountability' should be 'fixed' by some sort of
> blanket restriction...but it should be acknowledged as a problem.
>
> --
> Jon Lebkowsky <jonl@hotwired.com> FAX (512)444-2693 http://www.well.com/~jonl
> Electronic Frontiers Forum, 6PM PDT Thursdays <http://www.hotwired.com/eff>
> "No politician can sit on a hot issue if you make it hot enough."--Saul Alinsky
>
// declan@eff.org // I do not represent the EFF // declan@well.com //
Return to September 1996
Return to “Jon Lebkowsky <jonl@well.com>”