1996-09-15 - Re: Jury Nullification = Voting One’s Conscience

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aa26c0f23a6e0e936d54bf392752f3efa17b61dc1f97d153c496122bfc35de0f
Message ID: <199609150324.UAA03466@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-15 05:22:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 13:22:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 13:22:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Jury Nullification = Voting One's Conscience
Message-ID: <199609150324.UAA03466@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:24 PM 9/11/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
> And I don't think there has _ever_ been a case of a juror prosecuted/jailed
> for voting his or her conscience, regardless of jury instructions.

Where have you been for the last twenty years?

In fact a juror was recently jailed for this.  She had informed the other
juries of the likely severity of the punishment for pot, and refused 
to vote for conviction.

She was charged with perjury and various contrived and bogus charges.

The basis of perjury charge was that she had sworn there was no reason 
she could not do justice, and, according to the court, she was not
doing justice because of her opposition to the drug laws..
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread