1996-09-07 - Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks

Header Data

From: “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b0f2246c9a48965b9f9364806513641768bb3f091d9a7b4aeec923a6faac5cf0
Message ID: <199609070433.VAA26061@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-07 07:02:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 15:02:55 +0800

Raw message

From: "Ross Wright" <rwright@adnetsol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 15:02:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
Message-ID: <199609070433.VAA26061@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Or About:  6 Sep 96 at 23:16, Damaged Justice wrote:

> 
> This is utter horseshit. AOL, like any private individual or organization,
> has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, or
> even for no reason at all.

Sure. I agree with that, no shoes no shirt, if you are on AOL you 
accept "internet-lite".

> The gubmint isn't doing SQUAT, except forcing
> AOL to allow the spammers access.

Right now.  Yet it has been apparent to me that many people are 
begging for restrictions to be put in place.  Restrictions on 
spammers.  The government saying anything about regulation of the 
internet is bad...  Yet people still scream about a couple of 
unwanted e-mails.  I'm saying that this spammer thing could be the 
"kink in our armour" that lets the government into our little 
playground here.  Just suck it up and delete those messages.

Jog it off.

Ross

===========
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906





Thread