1996-09-20 - Re: DL in exchange for fingerprint

Header Data

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b6f8c55128daf1f44ff31b39c297aaec96c9b7f20b0e9568c3c357cea37b25a2
Message ID: <3.0b16.32.19960919224547.00c48460@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-20 23:18:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 07:18:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 07:18:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DL in exchange for fingerprint
Message-ID: <3.0b16.32.19960919224547.00c48460@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:10 PM 9/19/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>At 9:13 PM 9/19/96, Gary Howland wrote:
>>> Paraphrasing that famous quote, just which part of "not for
identification"
>>> don't they understand?
>>
>>Hmm - who are you paraphrasing here? (Just curious).
>
>"What part of "No" don't you understand?"
>
>and
>
>"What part of "Congress shall make no law" don't you understand?"

The question as to Social Security numbers came up earlier today in a
conversation off-list.

Do any of the lawyer types that hang out here know the exact statutes as to
use and misuse of Social Security numbers?

My understanding (probably flawed) is that it is (or was) illegal for
certain types of businesses to ask for SS numbers.

Does anyone know what the actual laws regarding this are?  Pointers to
statute numbers would also be appreciated.

Also, I noticed that the text "Not for Indentification" does not appear on
later versions of the Social Security cards.  (Comparing my card with my
fathers showed some interesting differences.  That text change was the most
glaring.)


---
Alan Olsen -- alano@teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction
        `finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key 
                http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ 
  "We had to destroy the Internet in order to save it." - Sen. Exon
                "Microsoft -- Nothing but NT promises."







Thread