From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b725d1098940e7aa4db93bef189e509a10a33414f1cb04093e6db16f0a4e0ca6
Message ID: <199609301325.GAA13466@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-30 16:58:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 00:58:04 +0800
From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 00:58:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard)
Message-ID: <199609301325.GAA13466@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> On Sun, 29 Sep 1996 12:16:27 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:
>
> >Symmetric multiprocessing is available, but it's often much less hassle to
> >have a single CPU running at 200 MHz than to try games with multiple
> >processors (which means more PCB real estate, more sockets, more of other
> >things).
>
> As far as SMP goes, it's actually not all that expensive. People in the
> linux-smp list have reported differences of as little as $50 for a
> uniprocessor vs. dual pentium system. Of course, every so often we'll get a
> message about a $30,000 system that can handle up to <drool>64 Pentium
> Pros</drool>!
Check out http://www.ssd.intel.com/tflop.html, where Intel is building
a 9000 Pentium Pro (200 MHz) machine for Sandia. Yes, it runs Unix,
and they've already delivered the first 64 processor node.
When finished, it will have 600Gbyte RAM, 200Tbyte disk, and run at
about 1.8 Tflops, and cover about 1600 square feet.
Price? 46 M$, or about $5k/processor.
Peter Trei
Senior Software Engineer
Purveyor Development Team
Process Software Corporation
http://www.process.com
trei@process.com
Return to September 1996
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”
1996-09-30 (Tue, 1 Oct 1996 00:58:04 +0800) - Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard) - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>