From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: be61f5a0e969d56e8c96dafa7e398cb3d71e2c607bb56493dcc869f7cf25ba3b
Message ID: <199609260351.UAA02953@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-26 05:54:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:54:50 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:54:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Mitsubishi MISTY LSI
Message-ID: <199609260351.UAA02953@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Nikkei English News, 24 September 1996.
>
> [Mitsubishi] fabricated the chip as a gate array using a
> 0.5 micron CMOS process and its own proprietary
> encryption algorithm MISTY. Operating at a maximum
> input/output speed of 40 megahertz, the chip can handle
> 32 bits per clock cycle.
Does anyone have a reason not to consider this algorithm snake oil? e.g.:
Was it developed by a well known cryptographer?
Has it been vetted by someone/some organization with reputation?
I other words, why should we trust it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | "Cave softly, cave safely, | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | and cave with duct tape." | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | - Marianne Russo | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to September 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:54:50 +0800) - Re: Mitsubishi MISTY LSI - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)