From: Alex Le Heux <alexlh@yourchoice.nl>
To: hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
Message Hash: bf17815099b608bcf15cd02e467e987bc80130140e76db7a242a0260f377427b
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960919000236.2090K-100000@sarah>
Reply To: <9609182121.AA13495@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-19 03:04:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:04:45 +0800
From: Alex Le Heux <alexlh@yourchoice.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:04:45 +0800
To: hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Spam blacklist project
In-Reply-To: <9609182121.AA13495@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960919000236.2090K-100000@sarah>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 18 Sep 1996 hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu wrote:
>
> Not impressed by their setup, there does not seem to be any checking
> to see if the mail address is correct (ie to checlk for a denial of
> service attack) and the setup requires distributors to submit their
> list for "washing". That type of setup may be OK for the bush league
> but its hardly cypherpunk type stuff. Its fairly easy to set up a scheme
> in which the blacklist can be distributed with no risk to the
> subscribers. Simply use a SHA digests and so on.
>
I didn't say it was their setup was the setup to end all spams :)
But I never really gave it much thought. It shouldn't be to complicated
to set some up like you describe though.
> I hadn't checked on Yahoo, I tend to use Alta-Vista having found
> Yahoo somewhat arbitary in category definition.
>
I usually check on Yahoo first. Alta-Vista always comes back with such an
enourmous amount of links.
>
> PS Sites that use red text on a white background ... ugh!!!
>
Ah well... Some people never learn :(
Cheers,
Alex
/// I dabble in techno-house and sometimes,
/// I do that badass hip-hop thang...
/// But the F U N K gets me every time!
Return to September 1996
Return to “roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)”