1996-09-27 - Re: Tamper-Resistant Software from INTEL

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: guthery@snailbox.com (Scott Guthery)
Message Hash: bfed7ffb6e655a564b4b7968ddcc8c9c62628367a33ca35c4ff94b2d48f88c28
Message ID: <199609270057.TAA00414@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199609242330.SAA16789@oak.zilker.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 04:14:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:14:12 +0800

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:14:12 +0800
To: guthery@snailbox.com (Scott Guthery)
Subject: Re: Tamper-Resistant Software from INTEL
In-Reply-To: <199609242330.SAA16789@oak.zilker.net>
Message-ID: <199609270057.TAA00414@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Mr. Guthery
> Has anybody heard of tamper-resistant software in general or a method
> for tamper-resistant software from Intel in particular?

     What do you mean by "tamper resistant"?

Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com

Thread

• Return to September 1996

• Return to “geeman <geeman@best.com>”
• Return to ““Scott Guthery” <guthery@snailbox.com>”

• Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”

• 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 11:07:35 +0800) - Tamper-Resistant Software from INTEL - “Scott Guthery” <guthery@snailbox.com>
  • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:02:26 +0800) - Re: Tamper-Resistant Software from INTEL - geeman <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 12:14:12 +0800) - Re: Tamper-Resistant Software from INTEL - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>