1996-09-28 - Re: Newsgroup proposal: misc.anonymous

Header Data

From: “David E. Smith” <dsmith@prairienet.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c0e73a33999ca63b3b907c889a7a631e8143a040188287549ff7d18df3f366ae
Message ID: <199609280340.WAA00327@bluestem.prairienet.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-28 05:32:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 13:32:49 +0800

Raw message

From: "David E. Smith" <dsmith@prairienet.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 13:32:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Newsgroup proposal: misc.anonymous
Message-ID: <199609280340.WAA00327@bluestem.prairienet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri Sep 27 22:31:58 1996
remailer@cypherpunks.ca blathered thusly...
> This sounds like a good idea.  I would certainly vote for such a news
> group.  Should the name be misc.anonymous or misc.anonymous.messages?
> Are alt.anonymous and alt.anonymous.messages basically to different
> newsgroups for exactly the same purpose, or is there some difference
> between them.

I believe that a.a is for discussion, and a.a.m is the "message pool."

dave




- ----- David E. Smith, P O Box 324, Cape Girardeau MO USA 63702
dsmith@prairienet.org        http://www.prairienet.org/~dsmith
send mail with subject of "send pgp-key" for my PGP public key
"Madness takes its toll . . . please have exact change ready."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMkycMjVTwUKWHSsJAQFiOwf+K5IdIzZim++s9mRK9K0cIG1Ofh6+kWhV
R9nrR8EglLTxOw97JdOIGhWeGFivWmU5IDbKaDVDnZFp3b14FWUu4680K5jRjGIU
3/M2DzKHOLKiZmoSkpBIuCYQ4IolrH4mBOMqNUpI/+mN0ORdDZ+ybfX4ThxTfabR
jxDNAMSbhmls9SNpBOyYPV9bWCdrhSXyQ4jE8g5lljDa6YZX8fToBN6uIyEC6DJ2
t2FwLLWGhs9VKQPFwg9guguN3yFEYi9hVtrjHyFTzva3Vj/algpukdTTMXvLXV9N
4bVwULnh58X0J3ov9+vd4LOXWAlYD6b7ejbqZ8mw3NBJkzeAJyzmVw==
=CfWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread