1996-09-21 - Re: Quantum Computers

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Rick Osborne <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c29fd5e9f7df3fcde6005eb7fec189d320b4b5a32361c3f949a1b9873f418198
Message ID: <199609211946.MAA28008@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-21 22:36:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 06:36:09 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 06:36:09 +0800
To: Rick Osborne <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Quantum Computers
Message-ID: <199609211946.MAA28008@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:09 AM 9/18/96 -0400, Rick Osborne wrote:
> I'm sorry if I seem to be making light of a very serious topic, but, last
> time I checked, computers don't have a reverse. 

Quantum computers *do* have a reverse.

Indeed even when operated in classical mode they *still* have 
a reverse.

A quantum computer is a reversible computer operated at very
high speed and very low energy.

Reversible computers were invented before quantum computers.

Reversible computer were invented in order to demonstrate that
there was no lower limit to the energy required to perform
certain computational tasks.

Later people speculated, and very recently demonstrated that 
a reversible computer operated in the quantum regime could 
do things that no classical computer could do.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread