From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “patrickbc@juno.com>
Message Hash: caa1b3a63304ce9af0be03e451bd14a0e35f88e4af428203f3a0a12c15d69752
Message ID: <19960901042711375.AAA140@IO-ONLINE.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 06:04:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 14:04:14 +0800
From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 14:04:14 +0800
To: "patrickbc@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Sen. Leahy's "impeccable cyberspace credentials"
Message-ID: <19960901042711375.AAA140@IO-ONLINE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:11:52 EDT, patrick b cummings wrote:
>I agree with what you are saying but not all polititions are that bad.
>You make it sound as if their are no politisions are for freedom of the
>net.
For the most part there aren't. Why? Well the media has sensationalized it.
How many politicians want to go on record as "protecting the rights of
child-pornographers"? Now, this isn't a major portion of Internet usage, but
you'd never know that from what you read in the paper. If you only listened to
them, it'd be something like this:
40% kiddie-porn
20% terrorists, bomb instructions, etc.
15% "evil hackers" who are going to steal our money, shut off our power, etc.
10% hate groups
10% pornography
03% right-wing gun nuts
02% other (research, entertainment, etc)
- "'Anonymity is bad,' says a source who wishes to remain anonymous." - Nuff' said.
* Home: Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
* Autoresponder: send email w/subject of "send resume" or "send PGPKEY"
* Work: cadams@acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 | (619)689-6579
* Member in good standing of the GNU whirled hors d'oeuvre
Return to September 1996
Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
1996-09-01 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 14:04:14 +0800) - Re: Sen. Leahy’s “impeccable cyberspace credentials” - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)