From: Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: cca864a95e063894cc7198242b2a0492728286a66b2d6b2f547c6d87b6470ec4
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=Premenos_Corp%l=KI-960904222454Z-7@ki.premenos.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-05 03:34:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:34:30 +0800
From: Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:34:30 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: rc2 export limits..
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Premenos_Corp%l=KI-960904222454Z-7@ki.premenos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
RC2 uses a effective key size, so is it ok to use a key of 128 bits size
with a 40 bits effective key size for export.
Thanx
--Surya
>----------
>From: Simon Spero[SMTP:ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 1996 8:33 PM
>To: Surya Koneru
>Cc: 'cypherpunks@toad.com'
>Subject: Re: rc2 export limits..
>
>It's the usual - if you want commercial jurisdiction,
> 40 bits unescrowed
> 64 bits (16 escrowed)
>
>Above that, you'll have to go through state on a per customer basis
>(which I don't think is that easy to get if software is being shipped
>outside the US, and is definitely going to be expensive.)
>
>Simon
>
>
>---
>Cause maybe (maybe) | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
>you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
>And after all | Email address remains unchanged
>You're my firewall - | ........First in Usenet.........
>
Return to September 1996
Return to “Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>”
1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:34:30 +0800) - RE: rc2 export limits.. - Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>