1996-09-05 - RE: rc2 export limits..

Header Data

From: Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: cca864a95e063894cc7198242b2a0492728286a66b2d6b2f547c6d87b6470ec4
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=Premenos_Corp%l=KI-960904222454Z-7@ki.premenos.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-09-05 03:34:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:34:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Surya Koneru <surya@premenos.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:34:30 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: rc2 export limits..
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Premenos_Corp%l=KI-960904222454Z-7@ki.premenos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


RC2 uses a effective key size, so is it ok to use a key of 128 bits size
with a 40 bits effective key size for export.

Thanx
--Surya

>----------
>From: 	Simon Spero[SMTP:ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, September 03, 1996 8:33 PM
>To: 	Surya Koneru
>Cc: 	'cypherpunks@toad.com'
>Subject: 	Re: rc2 export limits..
>
>It's the usual - if you want commercial jurisdiction, 
>	40 bits unescrowed
>	64 bits (16 escrowed) 
>
>Above that, you'll have to go through state on a per customer basis 
>(which I don't think is that easy to get if software is being shipped 
>outside the US, and is definitely going to be expensive.)
>
>Simon
>
>
>---
>Cause maybe  (maybe)		      | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
>you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
>And after all			      | Email address remains unchanged
>You're my firewall -    	      | ........First in Usenet.........
>





Thread