1996-09-05 - Re: flimflamery on anonymity

Header Data

From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dc638b5897efd28e2ce96b4a430f98b2752dfdcb628e8616a66c16bbc9869d64
Message ID: <v02130504ae5340b92dde@[10.0.2.15]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-05 00:52:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 08:52:52 +0800

Raw message

From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 08:52:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: flimflamery on anonymity
Message-ID: <v02130504ae5340b92dde@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
>(last line is sarcasm for the sarcasm impaired)
>a cpunk position I have seen repeated often. it goes along a very
>simplistic line of reasoning that I have seen TCM evoke repeatedly.
>it rather annoys me. it goes like this:
>
>cyberspace is merely discussion between people. anonymity should
>be allowed anywhere there are discussions (its a free speech issue).
>therefore it should be possible everywhere in cyberspace.
>
>this idea lacks a lot of subtlety in thought and to my mind is
>tremendously simplistic.
[snip]
>
>cpunks will also argue that anonymity can suffice for any
>business transaction. that may be so, but what about a business
>that simply says, "we choose to require identity among our
>customers, and you can go elsewhere if you disagree".

These attitudes create business opportunities for others who would seek to
serve those who prefer anonymity.

[snip]
>
>cyberspace as a whole is *not* going to lead to a totlal motion
>away from physical identity. in some ways physical identity will
>be more strictly enforced in cyberspace, in "some regions".
>there will be other regions of cyberspace in which "anything goes".
>

As long as attractive, anonymous, alternatives sufficient for those (of a
'cyherpunk' mind) seeking to communicate, transact commerce, etc. exist it
won't matter to whether others choose to enforce stricter identity
adherence.

[snip]

>of course in the cpunk mailing list, who cares if there are
>anonymous/pseudonymous participants? [snip]... but far more is at stake
>in the "real world" and the risks posed by anonymity will be
>adequately diluted because of this. and it won't be by people
>who are all "f***ing statists"-- it will be by reasonable people
>such as those who head EFF, who are interested in a civilized
>society.
>

As always the market and the street will decide.



PGP Fingerprint: FE 90 1A 95 9D EA 8D 61  81 2E CC A9 A4 4A FB A9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Schear, N7ZEZ       | Internet: azur@netcom.com
Grinder                   | Voice: 1-702-655-2877
Sacred Cow Meat Co.       | Fax: 1-702-658-2673
7075 W. Gowan Road, #2148 |
Las Vegas, NV 89129       |
---------------------------------------------------------------------







Thread