1996-09-09 - Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile?

Header Data

From: tbyfield@panix.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e7548f9bc9cef5eb21046176ff2b0e01bce3f350b4459317bb3513179f4fddff
Message ID: <199609091638.MAA19400@mail2.panix.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960909074055.27745B@offshore>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-09 21:02:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 05:02:06 +0800

Raw message

From: tbyfield@panix.com
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 05:02:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960909074055.27745B@offshore>
Message-ID: <199609091638.MAA19400@mail2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


vince@offshore.com.ai (Vincent Cate):

> If the Navy was firing missiles in this area, it really does seem like the
> press should be checking out this angle. 

   What makes you think they aren't?


/t

Thread

• Return to September 1996

• Return to “Arley Carter <ac@twinds.com>”
• Return to “t byfield <tbyfield@panix.com>”
• Return to “tbyfield@panix.com”
• Return to “Vince <demo@offshore.com.ai>”

• Return to “Vincent Cate <vince@offshore.com.ai>”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-09-09 (Mon, 9 Sep 1996 22:26:00 +0800) - TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile? - Vincent Cate <vince@offshore.com.ai>
    • 1996-09-09 (Tue, 10 Sep 1996 05:02:06 +0800) - Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile? - tbyfield@panix.com
      • 1996-09-10 (Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:41:40 +0800) - Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile? - Vince <demo@offshore.com.ai>
        • 1996-09-12 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 03:39:45 +0800) - Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile? - Arley Carter <ac@twinds.com>
      • 1996-09-10 (Wed, 11 Sep 1996 06:50:13 +0800) - Re: TWA 800 - hit by an unarmed US missile? - t byfield <tbyfield@panix.com>