From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 14:29:49 +0800
To: "ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: talker (fwd)
Message-ID: <19960909041342953.AAA192@IO-ONLINE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 8 Sep 1996 16:41:06 -0500 (CDT), Jim Choate wrote:

>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: "Z.B." <zachb@netcom.com>
>> Subject: Re: talker
>> 
>> I just checked www.juno.com to see what kind of system they have, and it 
>> appears that it is a free email service.  No charges at all.  No wonder 
>> we get so many idiots from there - free mail and they probably don't 
>> bother to verify the people they give service to, either.
>
>Well we know at least one cpunk who is anti-anonymity....

Not necessarily.  I think he's just saying that if it's free and anonymous you
have no quality control.  Even a token fee keeps out an amazing number of
loons...

- "'Anonymity is bad,' says a source who wishes to remain anonymous." - Nuff' said.
* Home: Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
* Autoresponder: send email w/subject of "send resume" or "send PGPKEY"
* Work: cadams@acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 | (619)689-6579
* Member in good standing of the GNU whirled hors d'oeuvre