1996-09-01 - Re: anon.penet.fi: URGENT REQUEST

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ff4fb1a12bac56450ec02cf2a356355baaa3a7c84b4dd0f86a1bbcbd11914991
Message ID: <199609011608.JAA22545@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 18:02:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 02:02:55 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 02:02:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: anon.penet.fi: URGENT REQUEST
Message-ID: <199609011608.JAA22545@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:09 PM 9/1/96 +0000, paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk wrote:
> I don`t know what the response to this will be, I need approximately 
> 5000 UK pounds to set up such an operation (Yes, a leased line really 
> does cost that much in the UK) and then a monthly income of around 
> 3000 UK pounds.

A little greedy.

Other people have set up a multitude of remailers for substantially less.

We now need remailers, preferably many, many small remailers rather than
one big remailer, that is as easy to reply to as alt.penet.fi, but which
gives substantially better security, that is to say the reply address can 
map to a remailer chain, instead of being constrained to map to a regular
address as the penet.fi remailer did.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread