From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 16:51:19 +0800
To: "Dale Thorn" <ericm@lne.com>
Subject: Re: gack vs. key escrow vs. key recovery
Message-ID: <19961005064623375.AAA228@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 03 Oct 1996 23:44:59 -0700, Dale Thorn wrote:

>Sounds to me like there's a need for a program that can produce secure 
>encryption, yet the output looks like "real junk", i.e., not anything 
>like what one of the *better* programs would produce.  Then you can 
>claim (with testimony of experts if necessary) that "I didn't encrypt 
>it, must be just garbage".  And even if you got some bozo govt. person 
>testifying against you, you shouldn't have much problem making them look 
>stupid and vindictive in front of a jury.


OTP anyone?


#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)