From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Bruce M.” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0a573da7770b7cac595f3761e5cc4cc225d4228689e8b29b4d676016e7748da7
Message ID: <19961005070449906.AAA214@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-05 10:02:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:02:20 +0800
From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:02:20 +0800
To: "Bruce M." <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Can we kill single DES?
Message-ID: <19961005070449906.AAA214@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:14:02 -0500 (CDT), Bruce M. wrote:
>> A Linux port (Pentium) would be *very* good - lots of Linux people tend to by
>> pro-cpunk. Ditto for OS/2. And who knows, if you hyped the business
>> aspects enough you might even find IBM or some other large corp willing to
>> donate some time on large system.
> Maybe Deep Blue gets bored in between its chess matches. :)
Or maybe they need something to test that HUGE massively parallel
supercomputer they're building for DOE!
# Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# <cadams@acucobol.com> | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
--- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)
Return to October 1996
Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:02:20 +0800) - Re: Can we kill single DES? - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)