1996-10-05 - Re: Can we kill single DES?

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Bruce M.” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0a573da7770b7cac595f3761e5cc4cc225d4228689e8b29b4d676016e7748da7
Message ID: <19961005070449906.AAA214@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-05 10:02:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:02:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:02:20 +0800
To: "Bruce M." <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Can we kill single DES?
Message-ID: <19961005070449906.AAA214@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:14:02 -0500 (CDT), Bruce M. wrote:

>> A Linux port (Pentium) would be *very* good - lots of Linux people tend to by
>> pro-cpunk.  Ditto for OS/2.   And who knows, if you hyped the business
>> aspects enough you might even find IBM or some other large corp willing to
>> donate some time on large system.

>    Maybe Deep Blue gets bored in between its chess matches. :)

Or maybe they need something to test that HUGE massively parallel
supercomputer they're building for DOE!

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread