From: C Kuethe <ckuethe@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
To: Anonymous <nobody@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message Hash: 0aeca53c9782d9252e4ed5e3c6035e3ce2c810f41cf3929feed7a24f474bc376
Message ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.961019210857.28954A-100000@gpu3.srv.ualberta.ca>
Reply To: <199610190449.WAA06334@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-20 02:52:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 19:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: C Kuethe <ckuethe@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 19:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: Anonymous <nobody@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: [PGP] Re: FYI - Biham/Shamir Differential Fault Analysis of DES, etc.
In-Reply-To: <199610190449.WAA06334@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.93.961019210857.28954A-100000@gpu3.srv.ualberta.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 18 Oct 1996, Anonymous wrote:
> As usual, Blaze/AT&T uses cypherpunks to spread FUD from it's NSA masters.
> This time, however, he's stolen the work of others and twisted it to suit
> the corporate goals. Bet his next message is a commercial from AT&T for the
> clipper chip, which, they will ass-u-re us, fixes this socalled <<attack>>.
> Someone should sue Blaze and AT&T.
>
>[SNIP] <argumentum ad hominem>
>
> Shame on him!
Glad to see you're smart enough to not likle clipper. And if you don't
like DES, don't use it. I don't. anyway enough of my naive comments, but
please refrain from describing to us the perversities of others... I
firmly hold that cryptology has nothing to do with your favored religion
or other *PERSONAL* decisions.
--
Chris Kuethe <ckuethe@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca> LPGV Electronics and Controls
RSA in 3 lines of PERL:
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
Return to October 1996
Return to “Tim Scanlon <tfs@vampire.science.gmu.edu>”