From: "Scott J. Schryvers" <schryver@radiks.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 05:25:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: boycott GAKkers (was Re: NYT on IBM GAK)
Message-ID: <199610041507.KAA10250@sr.radiks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 08:39 PM 10/3/96 -0400, you wrote: GAKked DES!  Talk about redundant.

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Adam Back wrote:
>
>> (I've seen HP, Sun, RSADSI, TIS, Apple, Atalla, DEC, Groupe Bull, IBM,
>> NCR Corp., and UPS mentioned).  Any confirmations?  Denials?
>
>IBM and TIS are definitely pro-GAK.  TIS is selling a firewall that uses
>GAKked DES.  IBM has been working on developing the "key recovery" technology.
>The article posted here a while ago that told of IBM's plans to support GAK
>also said that they were planning to license the technology to Sun and
>Netscape.  I don't know about the accuracy of that last statement.
>
>Mark
>- -- 
>PGP encrypted mail prefered.
>Key fingerprint = d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348
>http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3
>Charset: noconv
>
>iQEVAwUBMlRcsCzIPc7jvyFpAQEiIwf/btvAiIVHF3alGh+Vivr3MoHnSSciFjGX
>qhqdS+SEsM4cTxE+y8vvfpHFs/faQPmWLgT70lyf1pJ+Avei7brieb/qWoC5q9MJ
>gBlSa1f2yVMY7ax+KPTwU+Yk63A7oi964d+ebCp51BLOtzKammRlIw/nBFuDMq/5
>ss2a4w4PuOEOP35WQIy0i8NBoJxEi5gHx5J/+gGzWK9iw/yZa0xyoT25ci6uh7mJ
>sPgNmedr/Pq+D5gk5GduGgGni/jrDeADH0K7R0M8Jqlh0Xc82NPkau8xwZAXDMJV
>947PF56souwrx3BHmj7fXPXIVBJEjWy/Ymv2N8LBm+BHS09CN0ns5Q==
>=URZJ
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMlUoaf+hzPlzwZAdAQGopQgAvlREZb8S6SPQs/WQvZzkoR9ETJy1byEK
xGO/ymOpkivpGCZBXGcdOLnnDJbH26x8eh7iHi+Mzv6iVrbt11YkbZ9h7z7UTkdq
jtUMVN9MvOaKPxcLqTvcYgTOyKgLPYpIa27xKlP5Y7NqovacTHHA6TgSz5HjC8fQ
Jg+xCPDYsJTLEDmmdJVykJx/SU4ovIFP2o/8eF+LMIW7M3L7w5bHUO14HYkuMrUy
hpNp4NCycGbwia1GYkwfOYnx5YuQFSjBeubIm8sqC2Zs3A7B9OoTyOmec12JyvGz
G4kJe5vKhF+q8MktOSzazqMvdJ8PgQX0ecrhrurLVdVnwu1H1QB1ZQ==
=HViK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----