From: “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0f23e7e26f35d0fd64aaa9df59eb94bb273d0604c5350fb7624b275cc992cffb
Message ID: <9610032348.AA22047@pig.die.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-04 11:39:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:39:37 +0800
From: "Dave Emery" <die@pig.die.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:39:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Pager security
Message-ID: <9610032348.AA22047@pig.die.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lest anyone doubt this, pagers in the US have the same exact
vulnerability as those in the UK. No current paging systems use
any kind of serious encryption and all can be intercepted by using
a scanner, a very simple data detector consisting of one IC and
an ordinary PC running appropriate software.
I wrote a USENET article about decoding POCSAG paging back in 1993,
and am aware of at least four different individuals who have implemented
programs based in part on my description of the protocol - three of whom
have sold the product to the hobbiest market.
Dave Emery N1PRE
die@die.com
Return to October 1996
Return to ““Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>”
1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:39:37 +0800) - Pager security - “Dave Emery” <die@pig.die.com>