1996-10-04 - Re: WINDOWS NT ????

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “snajdr@pvt.net>
Message Hash: 25870914a890d069ce15181385316059e499d0d1f11e7aca553fe97bef0922b3
Message ID: <19961004024009156.AAA66@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-04 05:17:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:17:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:17:19 +0800
To: "snajdr@pvt.net>
Subject: Re: WINDOWS NT ????
Message-ID: <19961004024009156.AAA66@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 03 Oct 1996 19:47:06 +1030, Petr Snajdr wrote:


> is Windows NT secured system ?

No.

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)

Thread

• Return to October 1996

• Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
• Return to “pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>”
• Return to “Petr Snajdr <snajdr@pvt.net>”

• Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:17:19 +0800) - Re: WINDOWS NT ???? - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:00:14 +0800) - Re: WINDOWS NT ???? - pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 23:52:59 +0800) - Re: WINDOWS NT ???? - Petr Snajdr <snajdr@pvt.net>
    • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 08:17:36 +0800) - Re: WINDOWS NT ???? - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 07:07:16 +0800) - Re: WINDOWS NT ???? - Petr Snajdr <snajdr@pvt.net>