1996-10-28 - Re: Q.E.D P+P == talk the talk - but - P+P != walk the walk

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: cypher@cyberstation.net
Message Hash: 316df3213251a1ad73bb657056376012cbc0cbfba36d54afa6ddb9de786430bf
Message ID: <199610282054.PAA10298@homeport.org>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961027220837.11706A-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-28 20:57:57 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 12:57:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 12:57:57 -0800 (PST)
To: cypher@cyberstation.net
Subject: Re: Q.E.D   P+P == talk the talk - but - P+P != walk the walk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961027220837.11706A-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
Message-ID: <199610282054.PAA10298@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


cypher@cyberstation.net wrote:

| I withdrew the OTP claim and posted the ENTIRE algorithm, in a posting
|  
|            dated 10-24-96
|            addressed to Adam Shostack,
|                     and titled
| Montgolfiering P Information= P log_base_infinity P, 

I never saw this post.  I speak up only becauase quite a few people
have sent me mail asking for it, and I've never seen it.

| Since, then they they have suddenly grown silent. Nary a peep out of the
| previously oh so vocal. It is obvious that they are totally clueless about
| how to go about breaking the  algorithm, or they would have jumped at the
| opportunity to add a notch to their analytical gun.  As becomes quickly
| apparent, the algorithm cannot be broken except by brute force, which is
| patently impossible.

	Perhaps you'd care to share the mail that you sent me with the
list?  I refer to a message with Message-ID
Pine.BSI.3.95.961023194449.4317A-100000@citrine.cyberstation.net

Adam


-- 
"Every year the Republicans campaign like Libertarians, and then go to
Wasthington and spend like Democrats."

Vote Harry Browne for President.  http://www.harrybrowne96.org








Thread