1996-10-12 - Re: SPA sues C2, other ISPs and users

Header Data

From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 37bea5237294a810a69e42eb737b8c48321effb0a6b610e9bfe11881ebb39ee7
Message ID: <m2919clm3t.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
Reply To: <3.0b28.32.19961011141214.006e8aec@ricochet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-12 06:39:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 23:39:32 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 23:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SPA sues C2, other ISPs and users
In-Reply-To: <3.0b28.32.19961011141214.006e8aec@ricochet.net>
Message-ID: <m2919clm3t.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com> writes:

Greg> Particularly interesting is that they seem to be claiming that a
Greg> *link* to a pirate FTP site is itself infringing (potentially
Greg> contributory infringement).

Yes, at first reading it also seems to forbid things like
``warez.diamond-lane.net''.

I hate being threatened, even if the suggested course of action is one
I do anyway.  I also see the piracy ``problem'' as one of economics.
If their software was really worth what they were trying to charge,
there wouldn't be so much theft of it.

Both sides are scum and it's sad to see people like Sameer caught in
the middle.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
What are the last two letters of "doesn't" and "can't"?
Coincidence?  I think not.





Thread