1996-10-30 - Re: considering internet/privacy periodical

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Adam Shostack” <adam@homeport.org>
Message Hash: 390d8c49e4e58b9c6ff4a4e8545a762360742be16037060a24319d4caaf88e43
Message ID: <19961030061622656.AAA114@io-online.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-30 06:19:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 22:19:01 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 22:19:01 -0800 (PST)
To: "Adam Shostack" <adam@homeport.org>
Subject: Re: considering internet/privacy periodical
Message-ID: <19961030061622656.AAA114@io-online.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 28 Oct 1996 07:42:37 -0500 (EST), Adam Shostack wrote:

>| >I'm considering putting together a periodic publication about the technical
>| >and legal aspects of privacy and the Internet. My "business model" would
>| >feature free WWW/email access with a charge for fax or postal delivery. I'm
>| >curious to know if this strikes people as interesting or just Yet Another
>| >Email Newsletter Of No Real Consequence. (no offense taken if it's the
>| >latter.)
>| 
>| If you did a real noise-removal job, this could be very useful.  Sort of a
>| privacy-RISKs digest, if you will.

>	You mean like the PRIVACY digest, as occiasonally hyped in
>RISKS?

Yeah... Reinvent the wheel, why not? <g>

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread