From: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 3dd768d0016cab33f0f07d2092085845908d014715d936a507a8960cb4912608
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9610201251.C31709-0100000@aurora.intercode.com.au>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961019145359.19884L-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-20 02:37:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 19:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 19:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Wrap Up: Conference on Law Enforcement and Intelligence
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961019145359.19884L-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9610201251.C31709-0100000@aurora.intercode.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 19 Oct 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 4. Might be a good idea to review implementations of crypto.
>
> Both James Woolsey and Stewart Baker made sly remarks about the
> reliability of crypto in the public domain. [...]
There was also an interesting comment made in session three of the
Joint Australian/OECD Conference on Security, Privacy and Intellectual
Property Protection in theGlobal Information Infrastructure,
(Canberra, 7 - 8 February 1996), reportedly by a representative of
the DSD:
"... PGP may not survive as a viable option for private security."
For the full quote, see:
http://www.nla.gov.au/gii/sess3.html
- James.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>
http://www.intercode.com.au/
Return to October 1996
Return to “James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>”