1996-10-17 - Re: Re: SPA’s Press Release

Header Data

From: Fred Goldberg <goldberg@mars.superlink.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3eb9b0737d2fab3c7c69baabd7d6584308bea322e3361cb908154e668a349ca2
Message ID: <3.0b15.32.19961016222101.00b10588@mars.superlink.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-17 02:24:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 19:24:58 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Fred Goldberg <goldberg@mars.superlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 19:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Re: SPA's Press Release
Message-ID: <3.0b15.32.19961016222101.00b10588@mars.superlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/enriched

At 05:10 PM 10/16/96 -0500, Sean Sutherland stood upon his soapbox and declaimed:
>Their term, "contributory 
>infringement" is almost like suing the bartender because a customer got into a 
>wreck while drunk.

Right or wrong, in some states, at least, you can not only sue a professional bartender, you can sue any individual who serves liquor at a private party and allows a guest to drive home under the influence, if the guest causes damage to you or your property as a result.  Many people support this "vicarious liability" theory as it relates to drunk driving.

Next time, pick a better analogy.  You may have just given their lawyers the analogy they need to prove their case.


Fred Goldberg           WA2BJZ         EMT-D



Thread