From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 19:26:46 +0800
To: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Subject: Re: active practice in America [RANT]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961001161524.615C-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
Message-ID: <3251F258.643@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mark M. wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 1996, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > Re: Below text.  One of the most fascinating aspects of the Simpson
> > case (to me, anyway) is how persons who know about conspiracies,
> > mafia hits, etc., are still willing to believe OJ is guilty (fer
> > sure), looking only at the "evidence" presented by the same folks
> > who (send for list).

> Information about the evidence, crime and trial are not classified for
> the reason of "national security" in this case.

True, but what's reported is a joke, just like other media scams.

> There's a motive and there is nothing outlandishly unbelievable about
> the possibility that Simpson did do it.

I didn't say no possibility, just very little probability.  And what 
motive did this wealthy man have to savagely (inhumanly, yet) murder 
those two people?  There are people who have plausible motives, though.

> OJ never was in the military and there is nothing that even remotely
> suggests that he had anything to do with the CIA.

CIA, remotely?  I guess Colby, Jr. living next to Nicole is outside the 
boundary of remote?  I guess A.C.'s boss Ippolito, *close* friend of 
George Aronow, *close* friend of George Bush, etc. is also out of 
bounds?  Ever hear of international coke rings?  OJ was up to his neck 
in Mob, and looks like Denise Brown likewise.  Too remote for you?

> The Simpson case and the JFK assassination are not even remotely
> comparable.

Lessee, an apple and a banana are "not even remotely comparable", due to 
so many differences, etc.  But, I can eat both of them, and get 
nutrition from both, so, they *do* have quite a bit in common.
The Warren Commission, and all "official" treatments of the JFK 
assassination were not based on the real evidence, nor was the OJ trial. 
If you're one of those people who saw Ruby do it, and you said "gee, 
musta been just another wacko", then you could look at the OJ trial the 
same way and say "gee, just another crazy black man", etc.