From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:01:41 -0800 (PST)
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: FDA_dis
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19961028162547.006a4b74@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961029005904.23020C-100000@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I'll have to reread John's piece tomorrow (I'm on vacation right now), but
it doesn't surprise me. He and I have been arguing about this topic via
email for the last week or so. He takes the traditional liberal view of 
government regulation of drugs is necessary; I take the more libertarian one.

The Cato Institute, BTW, will be putting together a roundtable on this soon.

-Declan


On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, John Young wrote:

> 10-28-96. WaPo:
> 
> Dissing Declan's Hotwired slam of the FDA conference on 
> regulating Internet advertising and promotion: "Ultimately, 
> this debate isn't about speech. It comes down to how much 
> regulation we want."
> 
> Declan, singe dis negro inquisto, si?
> 
> -----
> 
> http://jya.com/fdadis.txt
> 
> ftp://jya.com/pub/incoming/fdadis.txt
> 
> FDA_dis
> 
> 
> 


// declan@eff.org // I do not represent the EFF // declan@well.com //