cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-10-16 - Re: Royalties

Header Data

From: pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
To: “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
Message Hash: 50c1c8581f07e96863ac8a55d5df29a954ace12556216f8c20b8c7212c0fabbf
Message ID: <32648F4D.5F75@pc.jaring.my>
Reply To: <Pine.SCO.3.93.961015192159.9275D-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-16 00:22:47 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 17:22:47 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 17:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Mark O. Aldrich" <maldrich@grci.com>
Subject: Re: Royalties
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SCO.3.93.961015192159.9275D-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
Message-ID: <32648F4D.5F75@pc.jaring.my>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mark O. Aldrich wrote:
> You cannot commercialize PGP whether you pay Ascom-Tech any royalties or
> not.  Phil Zimmermann grated an exclusive license to ViaCrypt, Inc. a
> number of years ago to be the sole commercial version of PGP.  In the mean
> time, PGP Inc. was formed and has acquired ViaCrypt.  Thus, PGP Inc. now
> holds the exclusive license on commercial PGP products.

Even the international version of PGP?

Thanks.

Thread