1996-10-03 - [NOT NOISE] Jena Temailer

Header Data

From: mixmaster@remail.obscura.com (Mixmaster)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 77c40ef150a3a6c54c3edf75d75b3a06a97cf61313694759a2edaa599bbdcf25
Message ID: <199610022000.NAA07022@sirius.infonex.com>
Reply To: <199609290412.VAA20552@dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-03 05:08:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 13:08:38 +0800

Raw message

From: mixmaster@remail.obscura.com (Mixmaster)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 13:08:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [NOT NOISE] Jena Temailer
In-Reply-To: <199609290412.VAA20552@dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199610022000.NAA07022@sirius.infonex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:

 s> At 04:10 PM 9/28/96 -0700, anonymous wrote:
 >> My first thought was to have them sent to a non-autopinging *.test ng
 >> via a well-tested parsing mail2news gate, but some autopingers ping
 >> ALL *.test traffic passing through a site.  If these ping messages
 >> didn't get automatically bitbucketed at the remailer site, this could
 >> be a problem for the operator.

 s> Most of the autopingers will ignore messages with "ignore" in
 s> the Subject: line.

We understand that, but the Jenaer Remailer configures the outgoing
message, which is essentially a digest of a user's recent mail, and
therefore the requestor has no control over the Subject: field.






Thread