From: Geoff Klein <geoff@commtouch.co.il>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 06:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why not PGP?
Message-ID: <199610111301.GAA02238@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: liberty@gate.net, rollo@artvark.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri Oct 11 15:08:41 1996

On 10 Octt Rollo Silver wrote:

> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code
>  in it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given
>  a copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
>  whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.

Pronto Secure is an e-mail client which pretty much fits Z.

>  Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?

Good question.
Anyone know if exporting Z has been tested ?

Commtouch does not currently export Pronto Secure from the US :)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Klein,     Pronto Secure Product Manager
http://www.commtouch.com, Tel: 972-9-963445 (ext 130), Fax: 972-9-961053
For my PGP public key send mail with subject: Get Key
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMl44zELv5OMYFK1FAQES/AQApuvGj1DFHOhSkUVJ4tyaQpHUYapC8cDA
I3HOd9Ic5hS4u/NCHFbHPlvbe+kFN8jBDlwtLcyOtbFiWcfOTJJcvJAWQgSadjjf
zvdfxFs5DXzIIepijQoGBSOtcPKn8F4UtxQ47G/7SViEUob1OkCrFUxmOtpkuFDh
5Yd720FJEnI=
=NdPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----