1996-10-04 - Re: ADJ_ust

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 84420a957442286fc6c2084713769a06a133b1512f0c549331b60b262dee5912
Message ID: <19961004020539265.AAD223@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-04 12:03:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 20:03:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 20:03:52 +0800
To: "tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: ADJ_ust
Message-ID: <19961004020539265.AAD223@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:26:12 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:

>Personally, I think there's a lot of hype about this whole "infowar" thing.
>Sure, security measures and vulnerabilities always need to be looked at,
>but a lot of the rhetoric is being driven by journalists looking for lead
>stories.

This is certainly the case with 99% of the computer industry press!

I certainly have no problem believing that a group of well-supplied
professionals could, with enough time and [political] support, take down a
single target.   For instance, if the CIA,FBI and NSA wanted to hose the 1st
Bank of China, I have a feeling that they would - eventually.   I have strong
doubts that someone would come up with a non-nuke that could destroy stuff
indiscriminately within a useably large area.

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread