From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8711cd85933163f5e7ced5b6350ed3ba736844e890ca9a372ec38c7c3418645d
Message ID: <53407h$5gn@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9610010807.A12171-0100000@netcom9>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-05 01:11:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:11:27 +0800
From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:11:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Export laws don't just affect crypto
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9610010807.A12171-0100000@netcom9>
Message-ID: <53407h$5gn@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <199610011632.MAA01864@jekyll.piermont.com>,
Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
>
>Lucky Green writes:
>> > Umm, so are you violating ITAR if you *use* these GPS-guided missiles
>>
>> No you aren't. A little known provision in the ITAR excempts exports
>> by missile. Seriously.
>
>Well, not quite -- it exempts exports by space launch, but I think
>thats intended for things like satelite launchings and not for things
>like missile attacks against other countries...
>
And I quote:
# (6) A launch vehicle or payload shall not, by reason of the launching of
# such vehicle, be considered an export for purposes of this subchapter.
# However, for certain limited purposes (see @ 126.1 of this subchapter),
# the controls of this subchapter may apply to any sale, transfer or
# proposal to sell or transfer defense articles or defense services.
- Ian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMlWELkZRiTErSPb1AQHn6QQAiylUndaqWbsVTScmyzn8dQlWS1vOx8tK
mBZlPlz0pvMY8jEi0pxT8PHsF2RI7vCi5yE4Z1PHAPDOUesrQiSZERzAlzRkxXgf
t2qn1ZSrlsgIEN50ttDoEu2geF74nakKeb4LtsTAmA7+dfceVZlu9v5sWfcoeAX/
utB5JYLMzz4=
=fbOv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1996
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”