From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9a07c60a6bbb690ced670b0b33563d464ef8764c3a0ade4d36bfc2eaf7479767
Message ID: <84648715026895@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-28 07:19:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 23:19:19 -0800 (PST)
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 23:19:19 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Secure Internet-based Electronic Commerce: The View from Outside the US
Message-ID: <84648715026895@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I've just made a draft copy of this paper available for comment as
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut01/paper.htm, a copy of the introduction is
given below. The whole thing is around 170K long (40 A4 pages when printed).
If anyone has any comments to make on it, please let me know.
Peter.
Introduction
------------
The creation of a global electronic commerce system will provide an extremely
powerful magnet for hackers, criminals, disgruntled employees, and hostile
(but also "friendly") governments intelligence agencies. This problem is
magnified by the nature of the Internet, which allows attackers to quickly
disseminate technical details on performing attacks and software to exploit
vulnerabilities. A single skilled attacker willing to share their knowledge
can enable hordes of dilletantes around the world to exploit a security hole
in an operating system or application software within a matter of hours. The
Internet also enables an attacker to perform an attack over long distances
with little chance of detection and even less chance of apprehension. The
ability to carry this out more or less anonymously, at low cost, and with
little chance of being caught, encourages attackers.
Because of well-publicized break-ins there has been a steadily increasing
demand for encryption and related security measures to be included in software
products. Unfortunately these measures often consist either of "voodoo
security" techniques where security is treated as a marketing checkbox only,
or are rendered ineffective by the US governments refusal to allow
non-americans access to the same security measures which it allows its own
citizens. Organisations employing such (in)security systems may make
themselves liable for damages or losses incurred when they are compromised.
This paper covers the issues of using weak, US government-approved security as
well as problems with flawed security measures, examines some of the measures
necessary to provide an adequate level of security, and then suggests several
possible solutions.
Return to October 1996
Return to “pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz”