1996-10-05 - Re: FUCK!!!!!!;-)

Header Data

From: Troy Varange <varange@crl.com>
To: N/A
Message Hash: a04fcdc637b40e15da9c58d68a5103a623aa1ab9bc7b0fa64db4b53756fe5155
Message ID: <199610050310.AA01791@crl5.crl.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19961003141245.006604ec@pop3.interramp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-05 05:19:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 13:19:59 +0800

Raw message

From: Troy Varange <varange@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 13:19:59 +0800
Subject: Re: FUCK!!!!!!;-)
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19961003141245.006604ec@pop3.interramp.com>
Message-ID: <199610050310.AA01791@crl5.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> >Or maybe this journalist, like most, doesn't know what the fuck he's
> >talking about?
> 
> To which this card-carrying member of the media replies:
> 
> Companies cited in the PRESS RELEASE - that means public relations product,
> not journalism product - were involved in signing off on what went into the
> release. By definition, no member of the press was involved in producing
> this document
> 
> It seems directing questions to the companies would be a good idea.
> 
> Will Rodger
> Washington Bureau Chief
> Interactive Week.

You media monopoly asswipes love corporate press releases because
your too cheap to hire real journalists.

Yes, there's a problem with publishing ADS as news.  Look at the 
magazine shelfs and the newspapers for proof.





Thread